bass death is a project im working on that consists of the theory behind a bass cannon, but scaled down, and with all found parts. (bass cannon = bass of death = bass death.) essentially its an experiment to see if bass cannon theory is scalable.
the theory is that off either side of any driver come equal but opposite polarity signals (in wave form) that we recognize as “tom waits” or “john coltrane doing is strangled goose noise thing”, but what we may not realize is that half of that speakers signal had to be killed so that we can hear the other half – otherwise these two opposite polarity signals neutralize each other, and this is exactly what “active noise cancellation” is all about. essentially, this is what a speaker “enclosure” aka speaker boxx is for – to deaden one half of any given speakers signal.
so Dr. Amar Gopal Bose – of Bose, and a resident lecturer and all around “cool guy” at MIT – goes, ‘ok, how can we capitalize on both signals – what needs to happen so that we can use both?’
and that answer lies in matching polarity!
and the way to match polarity? send one signal out a tube of distance X, and the other signal out a tube of distance 2X. now, the (extremely limited and thin) theory ive read on this is that higher than subsonics, and it doesnt work – but is should work for anything below, say, 150 hz. only in my minds eye, it should only work for one very specific frequency. never the less, those who have executed Dr. Bose’s strange and wonderous beast (and to scale), have reported success and have implemented it for various warehouse party situations – but im not about to invest in a 15″ sub, 1000 watt mono amp, or the concrete column forms.
having found many discarded, but working subs from 2.1 computer systems, i decided to use a 4″ yamaha driver, in combination with a few smaller but sturdy mailing tubes that house the rolls of banner we use at my shop. measuring 6 wide x 56 tall, these are about the best things going outside of actually purchasing the recommended solution, and the only thing left to procure was the mounts that would bring the whole thing together.
after a few beers, twice as many measurements (“measure twice, cut once”) and an evening of laying out in illustrator, i was ready to send my creations to the router. using scraps of 1/2 inch black pvc from some other job, i was able to bust out one test plate to check the measurements of the seat that the tube sits in – out by 1/10 of an inch! re-adjust measurements, and send the whole thing to cook!
next up was the glueing of the struts to the tube and plate that mostly hold it together. i used a silicon compound of some sort that seemed the most appropriate – really, what i had at hand wasnt all that good, so it was the best of the worst so to speak, but its held together fine.
after that dried, i then went at ‘er with a drill and screws, to really make sure she holds tight – 8 x 2″ drywall screws for each side, from flange to strut, and in tight enough to draw under so their heads dont interfere with the final mating, and 8 x 3/4″ screws / side from strut to tube, just to really make sure everyhing holds. once completed i then placed, marked, drilled and then mounted the sub to the tube with the slightly smaller plate (smaller so it can receive screws, while the other plate is big enough to clear the sub during mounting). initial tests of just the one tube with driver were positive, but the (fully working regular) speaker that i powered off the other channel of the same amp, with the same power and signal still outperformed it.
that part was last night.
FINALLY today im going to drill the last hole, feed the supply wiring through, mount the two halves, and power that baby up. although i might put in a (im guessing) better driver pulled from an altec lansing 2.1 system of similar proportions, but hopefully higher power handling.